Posted on April 30, 2008 by decisiondriven
Recently I’ve been writing quite a few deep and thoughtful blog entries on serious subjects that relate to accelerated strategy and product development (e.g. Massively parallel thinking, Thinking Breakdown Structures, Accelerate Ideas into Reality, etc.). I don’t want to lose sight of a simple truth - Decisions can be fun!
Decisions are how we human beings [...]
Filed under: Decision Concepts, Decision Driven Life | Tagged: innovation, decisions, fun, joy, Glory, create the future, triumph, destiny, God's smile, partnering with God, collaboration | No Comments »
Posted on April 29, 2008 by decisiondriven
For any strategy or design situation, a Decision Network provides a Thinking Breakdown Structure (TBS), a way to decompose the situation into well-framed, loosely-coupled, bite-sized and manageable “thought packages“. It provides a way to “Image the whole, then execute the parts” when the work to be done is thinking that creates the future (aka decisions).
Project [...]
Filed under: Decision Concepts | Tagged: critical chain, critical path, decision, decision network, earned value, massively parallel thinking, milestones, project management, project planning, thinking breakdown structure, thought package, work breakdown structure, work package | No Comments »
Posted on April 28, 2008 by decisiondriven
I’ve mentioned previously that a Decision Network provides a very powerful innovation framework for creating breakthrough products and services. Although every decision within a Decision Network can be an innovation “node”, some decisions are more innovation-rich than others.
Within the product design decision pattern, I have a Behaviors to Exploit decision that can be a launching pad for [...]
Filed under: Decision Driven Strategy, Sample Decisions | Tagged: decision, innovation, innovation framework, science, product design, technology, product innovation, new science, scientific behaviors, material properties | No Comments »
Posted on April 25, 2008 by decisiondriven
The following is crazy talk, but sometimes it’s helpful to aim impossibly high to uncover the roadblocks to dramatic improvement.
Why does it 6, 12, 18, 24 months or more to design and deliver a new product to market? How fast could it be done if all the inefficiencies were removed? Is there a theoretical limit to [...]
Filed under: Decision Concepts, Decision Driven Strategy | Tagged: decision, decision network, thinking breakdown structure, thinking, speed, time to market, product development, accelerate, value-added, problem domain, massively parallel, process improvement, decision blitz | No Comments »
Posted on April 24, 2008 by decisiondriven
In my previous post, I said that “Functional design is not just adding up the list of functions …, but rather organizing them into a lean, mean performing machine.“. Functional design is a fairly abstract process, so it’s quite helpful to have a set of “concrete” criteria that can be used to evaluate competing designs:
Here [...]
Filed under: Decision Driven Strategy, Sample Decisions | Tagged: criteria, systems engineering, evaluate, tunnel vision, product design, functional model, decomposition, functional design | No Comments »
Posted on April 23, 2008 by decisiondriven
Form - Fit - FUNCTION. I’ve always wondered why this little design ditty isn’t inverted; the heart of any product design lies in its Functional Model. This decision determines which capabilities the product will deliver to the end user; a product that provides more functionality or the same functionality with better performance will generally win [...]
Filed under: Decision Driven Strategy, Sample Decisions | Tagged: systems engineering, product design, functional model, logical architecture, form-fit-function, N-Squared diagram, interface concept, decomposition, modeling | No Comments »
Posted on April 22, 2008 by decisiondriven
The evaluation of alternatives in a decision should be a simple process that unlocks many insights. Effective scoring begins with a clear definition of criteria. Each criterion (factor, stakeholder goal) represents an arrow or vector in the direction of “goodness”. Scoring is the process of placing the alternative somewhere along this arrow based on its estimate performance. [...]
Filed under: Decision Concepts | Tagged: decision, criteria, alternatives, evaluation, scoring, performance estimate, utility function, design margin, diminishing returns | No Comments »
Posted on April 21, 2008 by decisiondriven
Everyone wants to make quick, hiqh quality decisions. It’s important to find a balance between “analysis paralysis” and “speed kills”. For example, I encourage the folks that I mentor to take their time when defining criteria; understanding their stakeholders’ needs, walkaway points (must limits) and priorities is crucial to a high quality decision. The best [...]
Filed under: Decision Concepts | Tagged: decision, criteria, alternatives, analysis paralysis, speed, stakeholders, evaluation, rapid scoring, speed kills, think it through, criteria pattern, pros-cons, strengths-weaknesses | No Comments »
Posted on April 19, 2008 by decisiondriven
I’ve coached folks in making a several thousand strategy, engineering or life decisions over the past 20 years. In most cases, we have used a simple weighted-scoring method to evaluate the relative “goodness” of alternatives against a set of criteria. Criteria are given weights that express their relative importance; a 10-point weighting scale is typically used. The [...]
Filed under: Decision Concepts | Tagged: decision, criteria, decision analysis, alternatives, margin, precision, weighted scoring, multi-attribute analysis, significant figures, performance estimates, keep-it-simple, weights, scores | No Comments »
Posted on April 18, 2008 by decisiondriven
Generally speaking, there are 2 types of effective consultants in the world. First, there are subject matter experts, those who have deep experience in some industry or technology domain, who have “been there, done that”. Second, there are methods-based consultants who use multi-disciplinary methods to work across industries and technologies. Their skills are rooted in common patterns [...]
Filed under: Decision Concepts, Decision Driven Strategy | Tagged: decision, strategy, decision pattern, mentor, methods, consultant, entrepreneurs, subject matter experts, methods engine, stage-gate, process framework, multi-disciplinary | No Comments »