The decision, Service Flow, is one of the more challenging decisions within the service design branch of the Decision Driven® Strategy decision pattern. I’ve framed this decision as “What series of steps will deliver this service? How will the engagement flow?”
Here’s the criteria pattern that I recommend when evaluating alternative service flow designs.
I’m certain that most folks use a Design-by-PowerPoint approach for this type of decision. They pop up a blank slide or copy an old slide with boxes and arrows and proceed to draw up their service flowchart one box at at time. Maybe I’m being too kind – many folks will just create a bullet list of steps. They may think about some of the criteria above as they add or rearrange steps, but they never formally define more than a single alternative. Design-by-PowerPoint is a recipe for tunnel vision. It confuses the ability to decompose a service into steps with the real thinking challenge of DESIGN. This error is then compounded by failing to evaluate their single alternative against any criteria; they assume it will work and work well enough to launch it without further analysis.
I’m not naive enough to think that I can kill off Design-by-PowerPoint. There’s nothing wrong with drawing flowcharts to describe alternatives; but it’s always wise to create at least 3 alternatives that differ significantly to stretch your thinking. By doing so, you’re asking “How else might we meet the objectives of this decision?”. This opens the door for a flood of new service innovation.
The Service Flow decision is very similar to the Functional Model decision within the design of a typical hardware/software product. The decision is challenging for just that reason – the alternatives are abstract pictures with lots of abstract components (steps, interfaces, work products), not something tangible. If the alternative flowcharts have more than 5 steps, it becomes very difficult to compare them at a glance. This is where a proven set of criteria is very helpful; the criteria help you think about the overall or end-to-end effectiveness of each alternative flowchart one factor at a time. They force you to ask the right questions.
A typical Service Flow decision will only take an hour or two to complete if you start with a proven criteria pattern. That’s quite a small investment with very high payback compared with Design-by-PowerPoint then trial-and-error delivery.
Please sign up for our next Using Decision Patterns webinar. It’s free! See the What’s Happening panel on the left for details.
Filed under: Decision Driven Strategy, Sample Decisions | Tagged: criteria pattern, decision pattern, Design by PowerPoint, engagement model, flowchart, functional model, service design, service innovation, trial and error, tunnel vision
